Thursday, May 8, 2014

Note From The Things They Won't Tell You In Orientation Week: Part 1 Desk.

Orientation week at university is something of a farce. Usually in one of two ways; a cute little fun tour or an all out piss-up. While both these can be fun and informative, key things are often left out. Such useful information might not be realised until a senior year, or never. Some things are for your own good, others for the benefit of your co-students. Likely a lot of it will have already occurred to you as critical thinking, logical studiers. In the event it hasn't this is what has occurred to me in five years and three tertiary institutes (I could say universities, but that would be giving a false accolade to one of the tertiary institutes).

Where to shit?

While this is unpleasant and we all love to pretend it is not our problem, it is, I assure you. I am no advocate of public toilets, particularly in tackling the 'dump question'. But it's a reality and something that bears thinking about. It will likely cross over to your day-life, but will be pertinent at university. Long hours studying, bad food, frantic class schedules, stress smoking, stress coffee and a pack a day prune habit (#studentlife). Unless you are a hot chick in a yoghurt ad, the odds are you will have to deal with your godless deed on campus at some point.
What you are looking for here is the least awkward place to do the devils work. Isolated buildings, disabled toilets, a staff bathroom (stathroom?) or the little porcelain palace on the edge of campus. The obvious thing here is to dodge the chance of running into ANYONE. Or, if others chance to have the same tactic, to be as far from the scene of the crime as possible when they show up to commit. Deny responsibility, avoid detection.
This varies extremely from campus to campus. Libraries are a traditionally anti-brown zone, though the library at Sydney University is 8 stories tall and each has a personal, and lockable, toilet with a floor-to-ceiling window view of the ANZAC bridge. Just joyous.
In a general sense though they will be seldom used lecture halls, neglected floors of tall buildings, underground retreats that are not known to the general pooping public. Your best bet is to explore with an empty colon. I do, every time! Happy hunting true believers.

Where to sit?

Class is a nightmare for the socially awkward. If you consist on a diet of meat and tobacco, as I do, or consist on a diet of regular phone calls and texts or chat snaps (A thing?) and such, this is a thing of careful consideration.
The conventional wisdom is to sit near the door. It ensures easy escape when the boring teacher quits being dumb, or when your bestie calls cause Jamie likes her or whatever. But conventional wisdom is just that, an idea shared by the masses.
It really depends on the two schools;
If you are expecting a phone call, or know you will get one because you are cute or dreamy, sit by the door. But not right in front of it; the rear corner nearest the door will ensure a quick turnaround and might have the perk of no neighbours. A seat in front of the door will put you between two others who have similar theories. The chance that you will all get bestie calls at the same time is too great, do the wise thing.
If, like me, you are smell conscious. Sit as close as you can to the teacher. As a 24 year old male I am comfortable enough to sit near an adult (#totallamewad) and understand the dynamics at play amongst my fresh-out-of-high-school comrades. People will actively avoid sitting that close to the dumb teacher and you can breathe easy, knowing that your stink cannot possibly jump a desk-long barrier (CAN IT!?!?).
The only problem is with a crammed class or a mature aged student. A crammed class will ensure a neighbour, who is often late and wants to redeem themselves. Mature aged students have the equal comfort near the teacher and, apparently, bloodhound like noses.

When To Talk?

Questions opened to the open forum of a classroom are a two pronged sword:

The first prong is the 'I might be wrong so I will wait until someone else says something'. This is by far the more noble and logical choice. No-one likes being torn down by their peers and, in any case, you can be only ever be kinda right. The risk to reward ratio is a fools errand. So sitting on ones hands is the logical course of action for those whose esteem is holding on by a thread. Also, if they make fun of me Jenny won't think I am kick-arse.

The second is the 'no-one is talking, my time to shine', the anti-thesis of the first. It's a thunder-stealer, the realm of teachers pets. OR, a big or, it is the realm of people who got confidence from the silence of the squad. If the quite-types had a valid inclusion, aka any reason to tear you or your thoughts down, they would say something in the first place. This is someone who isn't letting their parents pay several thousand dollars a year for quiet time.

But to the thunder-stealers, the silence is not an invitation for you to air all of your thoughts on the topic. Every question has an answer. If you have one, come forth. If not, be super uncomfortable like everyone else. The problem is that you don't just throw a verbal spanner into the works, you throw everything at it and don't know when to quit.


The key here is; try to gain enlightenment by benefiting the greater good, not just allowing them the benefit of everything you ever thought about.

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

A Note From The Grass Is Always Greener Desk.

Since I first left the merry ol' land of Aus, I have been frustrated every moment of my foot-setting on Australian soil. It's true enough I am no patriot, as true as it is that I love this country, in some respects. Since I was 19 I have wanted to leave and never, or scarcely, return. Objectively I do not hate Australia, but as an Australian with my sensibilities I am frustrated by it.
I fit in and so I can rest on my laurels. I am the supreme example of a laurel-resting type. If I don't have to strive for it, I won't. If I desire a change or something new in my life, I will let it melt in to the ether as something not attainable. I am a cynic, a skeptic of almost everything and will naturally follow the path of least resistance.
I moved interstate some years ago hoping to provide the same fire under my arse that a trip to Europe had done, to no real avail. It's too similar; there is the stress to find accommodation, employment, friends, a niche. But once you do it becomes home and 'home' is a trap. A trap some people are content in. Like my brothers, who never want to leave but I digress.
'You never really feel at home' is ponied up as a negative. Why should you? If you don't feel at home, you will live differently than you do at home. The point is not to feel at home. Melbourne, my current city is renowned as a great city; of pubs, clubs, live music, entertainment, comedy, theater, sport and culture. Yet I feel no need to properly partake. Why? Because Melbourne is forever and I will forever be able to access those things.
I was in Dublin two and a half years ago, two weeks coinciding with my birthday in June. For those fourteen days I went out every night. Why? Because I may only be there once and wanted to do all I could.
This is a flaw in me and my attitude. But traveling provides the well heralded new experience. Which could be seeing the Taj Mahal, or simply finding a bed. Necessity and desperation drag you out of your comfort zone, in which you can dwell but not live infinitely, and into the adult world of interaction.
It is this world I crave and it is this world, eyed from Australia's distant horizon, that the grass is greener. Or looks greener. And if you get there and it is much browner and more dead and in no way pleasant?

Notch it up as another experience and move on, it's greener over there.